Quantum Runtime

Runtime before QPU.

Reduce work classically and explore routing residual Runtime Spaces through a hybrid executor architecture.

Physical QPU execution and quantum advantage are not verified. Simulation remains classical computation.

RUNTIME BEFORE QPU

The goal is not to send the whole problem to quantum.

01
Large Problem
02
Runtime Spaces
03
Classical Reduction
04
MetaCore Routing
05
QPU-worthy Work
06
Result + Evidence

The research question is explicit: which Runtime Spaces should be eliminated or computed classically, and which residual spaces are worth routing to a QPU? That routing decision and its evidence are the product direction.

QUBO / Ising classical exact path

VERIFIED

Exact objective / QUBO / Ising equality in the current verified portfolio Runtime path.

Quantum Simulator Executor

IN DEVELOPMENT

Executor abstraction is being separated from the Golden Core. Simulation remains classical execution.

Physical QPU Executor

NOT VERIFIED

No physical QPU execution has been frozen as product evidence.

Quantum Advantage

NOT VERIFIED

No speedup or quantum-advantage claim is made.

HYBRID EXECUTION MODEL

CPU · GPU · HPC · QPU are executors. Runtime controls the work.

A Runtime State is not a quantum state. Runtime Space logically organizes problem and execution states; the Executor layer connects the residual work to physical computation backends.

Classical

Exact / heuristic CPU execution

Hybrid

MetaCore routes residual Runtime Spaces

Future QPU

Physical execution only after verified adapter evidence

“We do not build the quantum computer. We decide what should reach it.”

Executor API direction